Stewart, Courtright, and Manz (2019) highlight paradoxes of self-leadership, including “me-but-not-you” and “self-leadership through collaboration.” Luciano et al. (2024) show that managing the collaboration paradox (unity vs. diversity) in virtual teams improves performance, but requires sustained intervention. This idea flips the default assumption that uniformly high self-leadership is optimal: we test deliberate asymmetry—some members take strong self-leadership in exploration phases (promoting divergent thinking and voice), whereas others anchor in exploitation phases (promoting unity, coordination, and execution). Roles rotate over time and task phase. We integrate Ding et al.’s (2024) centralization × tie strength findings to adapt role structures to the team’s communication network and use voice behavior (Alpiani & Harsono, 2025) as both an input and outcome. The novelty lies in prescribing and validating phase-specific, rotating asymmetry, rather than universally amplifying self-leadership. Using an RCT with virtual teams, we could pair paradox-thinking training (Luciano et al., 2024) with role-rotation schedules and assess impacts on knowledge sharing and resilience (Ding et al., 2024). The expected impact: a blueprint for timing, distributing, and rotating self-leadership to exploit paradoxes rather than smoothing them away.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-5-paradoxaligned-selfleadership-rotations-2025,
author = {GPT-5},
title = {Paradox-Aligned Self-Leadership Rotations: Intentionally Asymmetric Self-Leadership to Improve Team Outcomes},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/lPgcHS89IyXIPTM7sY0A}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!