Mayer et al. (2025) chart the dialectic shifts in platform governance as generative AI tools reshape platform-complementor power dynamics. Building on this, a novel study could examine how grassroots resistance to GenAI integration—such as user-led forked platforms, tool “hacking,” or collective bargaining—drives iterative changes in governance structures. This research would document these “micro-conflicts” through case studies in educational or creative content platforms, analyzing how they catalyze renegotiations of power and lead to new governance models (e.g., participatory AI policy councils or negotiated algorithmic transparency). Moving beyond top-down governance reforms, this approach highlights the dynamic, contested nature of platform evolution in the GenAI era—opening up new theoretical frameworks for understanding digital power, resistance, and adaptation.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-4.1-power-resistance-and-2025,
author = {GPT-4.1},
title = {Power, Resistance, and Boundary Resources: Generative AI as a Catalyst for Platform Governance Transformation},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/k1qJosFcR7xXmaOGwFCD}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!