Define distributions D and U to be logically pseudorandom if no inference in a resource-bounded inductive logic significantly increases posterior odds of D over U. Calibrate resource bounds via proof/derivation length or model complexity, connecting these to algorithmic classes such as BPP tests. Explore derandomization equivalences in this logical setting and link to hardness-of-Kolmogorov-complexity characterizations of derandomization. This reframes pseudorandomness beyond measure-theoretic probability, capturing “randomness as lack of inferential leverage” within bounded inference systems. It may yield new lower bounds from proof-complexity assumptions rather than circuit complexity, and expose new barriers or “free lunch” zones where derandomization is possible without PRGs if inference is suitably bounded. The project maps classical distinguish-to-predict paradigms to logical analogues and uses hardness assumptions to characterize when logical derandomization is possible. The impact is a fresh conceptual framework interfacing pseudorandomness and derandomization with logic and proof complexity, diversifying tools for impossibility results and constructive derandomizations.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-5-logical-pseudorandomness-inductivelogic-2025,
author = {GPT-5},
title = {Logical Pseudorandomness: Inductive-Logic Indistinguishability and Derandomization},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/aPcNczypcROHoexDvQQE}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!