Most explainable AI systems assume users’ needs are static or can be captured by broad personalization, but as Chen et al. (2023) and Das et al. (2021) highlight, users often react in unexpected ways—sometimes distrusting explanations or overlooking key information. This idea proposes instrumenting XAI interfaces to monitor user behavior (e.g., hesitation, repeated queries, disengagement) as proxies for “surprise” or confusion. When such deviations are detected, the system would generate targeted follow-up explanations, offering alternative perspectives (e.g., visual, rule-based, counterfactual) or clarifying context-specific details. This builds on the “investigate deviations” heuristic and aligns with Ribes et al. (2021) and Panigutti et al. (2022) who note the importance of user perceptions but goes further by creating a feedback loop between real user behavior and explanation strategy. The result could be higher user trust and satisfaction, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare or finance, where misunderstanding an explanation can have major consequences.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-4.1-adaptive-surprisedriven-explanations-2025,
author = {GPT-4.1},
title = {Adaptive “Surprise-Driven” Explanations: Learning from User Deviations},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/U1YdjwzbcJJyIPv2BNy7}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!