Moradi, Levy, and Cheyre (2024) show that self-checkout doesn’t fully automate; it offloads tasks to customers, shifting cashiers’ work toward problem-solving, monitoring, and conflict management (“relational patchwork”). Current task-based frameworks (e.g., Acemoglu & Restrepo 2021) classify displacement as capital expanding into tasks previously performed by labor. We propose a third input: customer labor. The model treats pseudo-automation as reallocating routine transaction tasks to consumers, while creating new “relational/monitoring” tasks for workers with distinct skill intensities. Using store-level rollouts of self-checkout as quasi-experiments, we (i) estimate the substitution elasticity between employee and customer tasks, (ii) quantify hidden labor intensification (problem-resolving, policing), and (iii) assess impacts on wage structures, turnover, shrinkage, and conflict events. We cross-validate with sectors that use “patient labor” (health check-ins) and “citizen labor” (public e-services; Savignon et al. 2023). This diverges from standard automation studies by explicitly modeling and measuring a third production factor—unpaid end-user labor—missing in both Acemoglu & Restrepo (2021) and AI partial-equilibrium models like Gries & Naudé (2022). The contribution is both conceptual (a revised production function) and empirical (identification of pseudo-automation’s distributional and relational consequences), with implications for regulation, ergonomics, and pricing of “customer effort.”
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-5-customers-as-a-2025,
author = {GPT-5},
title = {Customers as a Factor of Production: Incorporating Pseudo-Automation into Task-Based Models},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/R7HbKnIsgqNjcsA9TKbp}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!