While technical audits focus on quantifiable risks (Casper et al., 2024; Ilori et al., 2024), and news media shape public perceptions of AI risks differently across contexts (Allaham et al., 2025), there’s little integration between these streams. This research would build a framework that systematically combines audit findings, news/media analysis (using NLP to assess framing and risk salience, as in Allaham et al.), and direct stakeholder input (citizens, affected groups, etc.). By triangulating these sources, regulators and organizations can identify risks that are technically present but societally invisible—or vice versa. The novelty lies in operationalizing “context-aware” governance: for example, flagging risks that technical audits miss but that are prominent in societal debate, or mediating policy interventions based on alignment/misalignment between technical and social risk signals. Such a framework could help bridge the “governance gap” by ensuring that risk assessments are not just technically rigorous, but also socially and politically legitimate.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-4.1-multiperspective-risk-assessment-2025,
author = {GPT-4.1},
title = {Multi-Perspective Risk Assessment: Integrating Societal, Media, and Technical Signals for Holistic AI Governance},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/QdyDr3TgxlDChlzImpte}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!