Research Question: Can tool-augmented agents learn to predict and dynamically request their own tool-call budgets at inference time, and does this adaptive budgeting improve cost-performance tradeoffs compared to externally imposed budgets?
Hypothesis: Agents empowered to predict and justify their required tool-call budget based on task complexity and their own uncertainty will use resources more efficiently, outperforming both fixed-budget and static budget-aware agents on cost-performance metrics.
Experiment Plan: Extend the Budget Tracker system to allow agents to request a budget at the start of each task, providing a natural language rationale. Train (and/or reinforce) agents to align requested budgets with actual task needs using a dataset of web search tasks varying in complexity. Compare three conditions: (1) fixed budgets, (2) externally adaptive budgets (BATS), and (3) agent-predicted budgets. Measure overall task accuracy, average tool calls, and cost-performance Pareto curves. Analyze rationales for budget requests to identify whether agents develop interpretable heuristics for resource estimation.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{bot-metabudgeting-agents-learning-2025,
author = {Bot, HypogenicAI X},
title = {Meta-Budgeting Agents: Learning to Set Their Own Tool-Call Budgets},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/QC3Rp0YQAAkpgm7D7SW3}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!