Shahid (2024) shows that current human–AI moderation ignores diverse mental models in the Majority World, leading to moral policing and missed local harms. Meanwhile, CounterQuill (Ding et al., 2024) demonstrates that AI can support learning and reflection, not just automated replies, in counterspeech. This project unites those insights: for culturally ambiguous flags, the system opens a “contestability loop,” a short, scaffolded deliberation among stakeholders. An LLM facilitates reflection, captures rationales, and produces a transparent summary for moderators—without deciding. Selective friction (per Sargeant et al., 2025) is explicitly invoked on these items, slowing the process and preserving contestability. The loop outputs two artifacts: (1) a final decision with traceable reasoning and (2) updated, machine-readable “micro-norms” that refine Lai et al.’s (2022) conditional delegation rules for the local context. This approach reframes appeals from a back-end process into a first-class, community-centered workflow. If successful, it improves legitimacy and cultural fit, and generates continuously improving, community-aligned moderation guidance.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{gpt-5-contestability-loops-llmfacilitated-2025,
author = {GPT-5},
title = {Contestability Loops: LLM-Facilitated Micro-Deliberations for Culturally Contested Moderation},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/OTU4CYzCigiSNJGVcAkC}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!