I've noticed that if I don't specifically ask LLMs to ground certain observation in a text or an image that I've sent to the LLM, then it tends to invoke extra information, often leading to hallucination. But that if I do ask for that grounding, then it tends to be specific and monocausal, only making observations that can relate to exactly one part of the input document or context. Is this a fundamental tension in LLMs?
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{holtzman-a-tension-between-2026,
author = {Holtzman, Ari},
title = {A Tension Between Abstraction and Grounding},
year = {2026},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/ODkePWQU2Cj2i6khBrdS}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!