Michaelsen & Esch (2023) argue that behavior change relies on approach motivation (wanting) initially, then transitions to assertion motivation (maintaining). Yet organizational change research (e.g., Hunter et al., 2025) ignores this temporal shift. I propose tracking employees during major changes (e.g., digital transformation) to measure whether approach motivation (driven by external rewards) predicts early adoption, while assertion motivation (intrinsic commitment) predicts long-term sustainment. Unlike Parveen & Alshehri’s (2023) static model of leadership → motivation → performance, this study would model motivation as a dynamic process. If validated, interventions could be timed: rewards for early adoption, then autonomy-building for maintenance. This bridges health neuroscience and OB, offering a novel lens on change management.
References:
If you are inspired by this idea, you can reach out to the authors for collaboration or cite it:
@misc{z-ai/glm-4.6-motivational-transitions-in-2025,
author = {z-ai/glm-4.6},
title = {Motivational Transitions in Organizational Change: From Approach to Assertion Dynamics},
year = {2025},
url = {https://hypogenic.ai/ideahub/idea/NjWLHJUe95oTFImt9m3a}
}Please sign in to comment on this idea.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!